Exploring profit - Sustainability trade-offs in cropping systems using evolutionary algorithms

نویسندگان

  • P. deVoil
  • Walter A. H. Rossing
  • G. L. Hammer
چکیده

Models that implement the bio-physical components of agro-ecosystems are ideally suited for exploring sustainability issues in cropping systems. Sustainability may be represented as a number of objectives to be maximized or minimized. Models provide a means to evaluate system performance for alternative strategic, tactical and operational decisions. The full decision space is usually very large and simplifications based on insight into agronomic relations and farming practice are necessary to safeguard computational feasibility. Different optimisation approaches have been proposed in the literature, usually based on mathematical programming techniques. The disadvantage of these techniques is that they can only deal with greatly simplified system descriptions, thus excluding the direct use of bio-physical system models. Here, we present a global search approach based on an Evolutionary Algorithm (EA). We introduce a multiobjective evaluation technique within this EA framework, linking the optimisation procedure to the APSIM cropping systems model, and perform simulations in parallel over an existing computer network. A case study addressing crop choice and sowing rules in north-east Australian cropping systems is used to illustrate the EA methodology. Sustainability of these systems is evaluated in terms of economic performance (gross margin, financial risk) and resource use (erosion). Because of the limited size of the problem, the quality of the EA optimisation can be assessed by comparison to a large sample of the full problem domain. Results demonstrate that the EA procedure, parameterized with generic parameters from the literature converges to a useable solution set within a reasonable amount of time. Frontier “peels” or pareto-optimal solutions as described by the multiobjective evaluation procedure provide useful information for discussion on trade-offs between conflicting objectives. Application to a more realistic decision problem is recommended to evaluate the usefulness of the approach in informing discussions on agro-ecosystem design.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Reconciling Pesticide Reduction with Economic and Environmental Sustainability in Arable Farming

Reducing pesticide use is one of the high-priority targets in the quest for a sustainable agriculture. Until now, most studies dealing with pesticide use reduction have compared a limited number of experimental prototypes. Here we assessed the sustainability of 48 arable cropping systems from two major agricultural regions of France, including conventional, integrated and organic systems, with ...

متن کامل

Defining Pathways and Trade-offs Toward Universal Health Coverage; Comment on “Ethical Perspective: Five Unacceptable Trade-offs on the Path to Universal Health Coverage”

The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) World Health Report 2010, “Health systems financing, the path to universal coverage,” promoted universal health coverage (UHC) as an aspirational objective for country health systems. Yet, in addition to the dimensions of services and coverage, distribution of coverage in the population, and financial risk protection highlighted by the report, the conside...

متن کامل

Evolutionary Algorithms, Multiobjective Optimization, and Applications

This paper gives an introduction into evolutionary computation, in particular in the light of multiobjective optimization, and demonstrates how evolutionary algorithms can be used to tackle a highly demanding application in telecommunications, namely the design of a network processor. 1 Introductory Example To illustrate the basic principles of multiobjective optimization and evolutionary algor...

متن کامل

Sustainability and integrated weed management in Australian winter cropping systems: a bioeconomic analysis

Economic evaluations of the benefits of integrated weed management often only consider the benefits of management in the crop phase, and ignore the impact of rotational options. In particular, non-crop phases such as annual and perennial pasture phases can have a substantial impact upon weed population dynamics and economic returns. Moreover, extended perennial pasture phases are being promoted...

متن کامل

Measure and comparison of economic, social and ecological sustainability of farming systems in the Marvdasht plain

Agricultural sustainability refers to the ability of a cropping system to produce, without causing irreversible damage tothe ecosystem. There is an increasing need to view cropping systems and identify management practices in a holisticindicator-based impact assessment. The main objective of this study was to compare and rank the cropping systems of theMarvdasht plain in Fars Province; in order...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Environmental Modelling and Software

دوره 21  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006